RUINE

Behavioral Mechanics

Your team’s workarounds are telling you something

At the Dwarf House, growth had left the kitchen with a shape the team had to work around.

A conceptual diner facade with a small red doorway and overlapping kitchen additions behind it.
Behavioral Mechanics · Original editorial illustration

You learn the turn by carrying something through it.

After a while, your body remembers. A half step to the side. A pause while someone passes. The inconvenient corner becomes part of the job.

Chick-fil-A’s account of the Hapeville Dwarf House describes a kitchen expanded repeatedly as the restaurant grew. Those additions left a jagged, inefficient layout for team members to navigate. The restaurant was operating beyond capacity; customers waited for parking spaces. The 2022 rebuild created room for more than twice the original location’s customer capacity while retaining familiar features, including the little red door.

A business can accommodate a difficult arrangement for so long that its people stop reporting the difficulty.

They have learned the turn.

Listen for the unofficial instructions

“Send that to me first.” “Use the old spreadsheet.” “Call this person if you need it done today.”

These instructions can sound like evidence of a resourceful team. Often they are. They can also reveal the work the official process cannot carry.

In a company with established departments, the workaround may be sophisticated: a director quietly reconciles competing forecasts, an account team rewrites a standard proposal, or a location maintains its own version of the offer because the central version does not fit.

Notice what keeps recurring. One exception may require judgment. A repeating exception deserves a closer reading.

Ask what the workaround protects

A shortcut might protect the customer from a slow reply. A duplicate document might preserve information the main system discards. An informal approval might prevent a promise operations cannot keep.

If you remove the workaround without understanding its purpose, you can remove a small piece of care that has been compensating for a larger problem.

Ask the person using it to show you a recent example. What happened just before? What would happen without the extra step? Who benefits? Who carries the effort?

Start with curiosity. People are more likely to show you the actual arrangement when the inspection feels useful to their work.

Distinguish a local fix from a structural condition

Some friction needs a clearer instruction or a better tool. Some points to an offer, responsibility, or handover that has become incompatible with the company’s scale.

If several teams maintain separate explanations of the same service, investigate the service definition. If every substantial engagement needs an exceptional approval, investigate the decision rights. If marketing repeatedly edits around a limitation in delivery, investigate the promise.

Count the recurring effort as well as the visible failure. An arrangement can appear to work because capable people are spending hours making it work.

Redesign with the people who navigate it

Bring the affected teams into the diagnosis and the trial of the replacement. Establish what the new arrangement should make easier and which qualities the old workaround protected.

Test a real case. Does the customer receive the same care? Is the responsibility clearer? Can the work move without someone privately translating the rules?

Sometimes one doorway needs moving. Sometimes the kitchen has been expanded as far as it can sensibly go.

The people carrying the trays can help you tell the difference.

Sources and context

Historical details are grounded in the sources below. Business interpretations are RUINE’s editorial analysis. The featured image is an original conceptual illustration, not a historical photograph or measured drawing.

Continue reading at The Desk, or begin with What is a brand brokerage?

Questions people ask

Are workarounds always a problem?

No. Some are appropriate uses of judgment. Repeated workarounds are useful evidence, particularly when they compensate for unclear responsibilities, incompatible promises, or systems that no longer fit the work.

How do we investigate workarounds without blaming employees?

Ask people to demonstrate a recent case and explain what the extra step protects. Assess the surrounding process and incentives before removing the workaround.

Written by

Whit Hope McDannald

Whit Hope McDannald is the founder of RUINE. She writes about the problem underneath the problem.

Turn the pageWhen the company grows beyond its founder’s line of sightConsider how judgment reaches the edges of the company.

Show us the workarounds, the repeated questions, and the decisions people keep making. Those are useful evidence for what needs to change.

Bring the situation to RUINE

Further from here

Keep thinking.

Why customers don’t always choose the better productAll writing

Explore RUINE